Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

Important!

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 21:55 on 5 May 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 58.145.189.219 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• Adilllllll (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. This user wasn't banned, he came back and did the exact same edits again only to be reverted by someone else. This is clearly being disruptive and is not learning. Also, this is a clear case of violation WP:3RR and edit warring. Govvy (talk) 20:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

  Warned user. Nobody had done that yet ... so we are supposed to be surprised he kept doing it? Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

• Ganavi K.P (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; account is being used only for promotional purposes. creation of a number of ostensibly similar articles, all up for one form pf deletion or another, after only warning. Appears to be here to promote plastic weaving in a Mumbai "unofficial settlement". 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

  Their prior behaviour, almost all today, has been removal of reverences frm a small number of articles. They had not been warned for that. However, they have moved on to promotion of plastic weaving 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:33, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

  Annoying, but I'd let the deletion discussions come to a conclusion and then enforce that, unless there are more article creations in the meantime. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:53, 5 May 2025 (UTC)